Another question that might come up with respect to these studies is the issue of contamination.If young organic material became mixed with the dinosaur material that was carbon-14 dated, then the younger material would skew the result to a younger age.But, if they were not that old, merely thousands of years old, then carbon-14 dating applied to dinosaur fossils might detect some carbon-14 atoms. These findings about dinosaur fossils are just a piece of the evidence indicating assumed ages are perhaps mistaken.
Accessed 2013 Oct" href="#footnote11_sisqpci"11 Soft tissue normally will deteriorate over time.
Soft tissue should not last 65 million years, yet it has been found in a dinosaur fossil which “has” to be at least that old.
Given the initial amount of carbon-14, the decay rate, and the remaining amount of carbon-14 in a fossil, the length of time it would take for the initial amount of carbon-14 to decay to the amount measured as remaining in the fossil may be calculated.
Carbon-14 decays with a half-life of about 5,730 years.
Accessed 2013 Jul 2" href="#footnote2_4sk6flk" Both the carbon-14 dating results and the discovery of soft tissue in incompletely fossilized dinosaur bones share the common theme of being indicators of much younger ages for dinosaurs than evolution claims.
Compared to the conventional theory of dinosaurs’ being at minimum 65 million years old, the time it would take soft tissue to degrade and the Each of the two thousand meeting participants was given a disc which included the abstract of the carbon-14 dating report.No, the University of Georgia had extended the maximum limit up over 50,000 years, and the ages were all well below this. After all, even though these ages are much younger than conventional ages, many creationists believe life on earth to be much younger than even the reported carbon-14 ages of these dinosaur fossils.This question will be dealt with in a later section of this article.Below is a list of some dinosaur fossils and their dated ages from the Miller paper.Are the dates beyond the range of testing technology?Diamonds supposedly formed even further back in the past than dinosaurs —over a billion years ago.